Grace And Sin At The Dawn Of Moral Experience

Share

Grace and Sin at the Dawn of Moral Experience

William H. Marshner

2006

In a notorious article of the Prima Secundae, Aquinas claimed that the first moral decision of an unbaptized child could not result in a venial sin. If the decision was bad, the sin could only be mortal. On the other hand, if the decision was good, the same unbaptized child was freed from original sin. The common doctor’s argument for these claims wove together threads of psychology, moral theology, and eschatology, to fashion a controversial doctrine — elegant, but hard to defend, and in conflict with his own work on faith and justification. This paper will unravel the threads and propose a revised doctrine, less elegant but more plausible, and free of conflict.[1]
Continue reading “Grace And Sin At The Dawn Of Moral Experience”

Structure Of The Church East And West

Share

Structure of the Church East and West

Two-Lung Traditions vs. One-Lung Deviations

William H. Marshner, S.T.D.

Orientale Lumen Conference
Washington DC 2004
San Diego 2005

I begin with this question: what is the right starting point for theological reflection on the structure of the Church? One might think, “Well, the New Testament, of course” But this answer is not enough. As Fr. Raymond Collins pointed out to us, last night, the New Testament evidence is “less than clear.” Fr. Collins indicated three New Testament pictures, as you may recall: the charismatic, the Christian rabbinic, and the household overseer. It is important to add, however, that the New Testament text itself does not tell us whether these are three structures or are three different ways of describing one structure. Continue reading “Structure Of The Church East And West”

Natural Desire And Natural End: A Critical Comparison Of Cajetan, Soto And Bañez

Share

March, 1999

Table of Contents

Preface
vii

Chapter 1. The Source of a Divergence
1

Chapter 2. Cajetan’s First Account of the Desire to See God
23
  A. Aquinas’s Text (1 ST q. 12, a. 1)
23
  B. Cajetan’s Commentary
32
  C. Analysis of Cajetan’s Text
46
   — 1. What was the core of Cajetan’s solution?
47
   — 2. What of theological interest followed from this core?
51
   — 3. Why two “ways of considering” intellectual creatures?
62
   — 4. Which consideration was St. Thomas using?
69
   — 5. Given the above, what was Cajetan’s solution to the second dubium?
71
   — 6. Given the above, what was Cajetan’s solution to the first dubium?
72
 D. Concluding evaluation
74

Chapter 3. Beatitudo and Cajetan’s Second Account of the Desire
77
  A. A short primer on beatitudo
77
   — 1. The sense of `beatitudo’
77
   — 2. The ratio beatitudinis on the general level
80
   — 3. Transition: the job of further rationes
82
   — 4. The rationes beatitudinis on the special level
84
   — 5. This life and the next
86
   — 6. Concrete ideal vs. what one settles for
87
  B. 2/1 ST q. 3, a. 6; Aquinas’s text
90
  C. Cajetan’s commentary on article 6
93
  D. 2/1 ST q. 3, a. 7; Aquinas’s text
105
  E. Cajetan’s commentary on article 7
106
  F. 2/1 ST q. 3, a. 8; Aquinas’s text
109
  G. Cajetan’s commentary on article 8
112
  H. Concluding evaluation
121

Chapter 4. Cajetan on Man’s Potency to Supernatural Gifts
123
  A. Nature, art, and the supernatural
125
  B. Connatural vs. supernatural in 1 ST q. 12, a. 5 and in the commentary thereon
138
  C. The hidden end in Aquinas’s texts
153
  D. Cajetan’s explanation of the hiddenness in his commentary on 1 ST q. 1, a. 1
157
  E. Quaestio 1 of De potentia neutra
165
  F. Quaestio 2 of De potentia neutra
175
  G. Concluding evaluation
194

Chapter 5. Dominico Soto: in the Cause of an Augustinian End
197
  A. NG I, c. 3. On man conceived purely in his natural features
199
  B. NG I, c. 4. What duties a man with only his natural features could perform
213
  C. Soto attacks Cajetan on `natural end’
220
  D. Concluding remarks
244

Chapter 6. Dominic Bañez: Triumph of a Scholastic Nature
249
  A. First disputation — Is it true that a created intellect can see God clearly?
252
   — 1. The second objection and Bañez’s response
254
   — 2. The sixth objection and Bañez’s response
269
  B. Second disputation — what to make of the desiderium naturae
273
   — 1. Bañez’s first conclusion
278
   — 2. Bañez’s second conclusion
281

After word
305

Bibliography
311

Click here for PDF

Rahner’s Basic Stencil

Share

Rahner’s Basic Stencil

W. H. Marshner

0.0 The following text is a hypothesis as to how the late Karl Rahner, S.J., applied in his theology a certain fixed pattern in construing the mysteries of the Faith. I call this pattern his stencil. Under my hypothesis, certain conceptual moves distinctive of his theology were made so as to put him in a position to apply the stencil. By its repeated applications he was able to impose upon the mysteries both a far-reaching isomorphism and a transcendental meaning. The first and basic application was as follows.

Continue reading “Rahner’s Basic Stencil”

Three Problems in Calvinism

Share

Three Problems in Calvinism

W. H. Marshner

Suppose God pulls me up by my armpits to make me stand. If my legs stay jelly, does He succeed in making me stand? No. My muscles and sinews must become such that, in real terms, I am standing on them. The same is true when we take ‘stand’ more broadly to refer to our being alive and upright before God spiritually. God lifts me up by His grace to make me alive and upright. If my inner faculties remain dead as doornails, does He succeed in making me alive? If they remain utterly prostrate in sin, does He succeed in making me stand? No. My mind and will must be-come such that, in real terms, I am living-for-God in them. This point Calvinism recognizes (against Luther) and rightly so: in those whom He is saving, God accomplishes a real work of sanctification.

Continue reading “Three Problems in Calvinism”

The Immaculate Conception And Recent Ecclesiology

Share

THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION AND RECENT
ECCLESIOLOGY:

III. Mary, the Church, and Sinlessness

WILLIAM H. MARSHNER

Christendom College
Front Royal, Virginia
1984

How does the grace of the Immaculate Conception illuminate the problems of ecclesiology? How does it clarify the new being to which we are called in the Church of God?

The purpose of this paper is to answer these questions with respect to a specific and crucial issue: the sinlessness of the Catholic Church, which is, as St. Ambrose put it, ex maculis immaculata. In order to address this issue, I must begin again with the original questions and summarize for the reader the pre-requisite clarifications which I have tried to bring to them in previous papers. Continue reading “The Immaculate Conception And Recent Ecclesiology”